Michael Landon, a former missionary to Brazil, is currently finishing
his dissertation for a PhD in intercultural studies at Trinity Evangelical
Seminary. The following are taken from his Annotated Bibliography on Brazil
for Experienced Missionaries, Revised Edition, 1994. The following citations
have applications to more than just Brazil.
This book deserves special mention. Although it focuses on Spanish
speaking countries and is dated, it made so many things clearer for me! The
best part is the first half, where Nida explains three important contrasts in
Latin American life. He explains that Latin Americans are both authoritarian
and individualist, idealistic and realistic, and machistic and hebrimistic
(woman-centered). It is this tension between these two poles that confuses us
North Americans because we expect one type of behavior, not both. If you
read, or reread, only one thing from this bibliography, I recommend this book.
Urban Brazilians believe in the limited good, that is the increase in
the wealth of one person is directly related to the decrease in wealh of another
person. There is a limited amount of wealth in the world. This is a
foundational article on this concept.
A simple article explaining that Westerners assume a difference
between natural and supernatural which many other cultures do not. If
western missionaries do not teach about relationships between earth and
spirits, many will fill in this unnatural void with folk religion or magic.
Hiebert calls for a missionary encounter with the other culture on three levels:
truth (ultimate), power (human experience) and empiricism (natural truth).
1991 "The Hidden Middle," MARC Newsletter, numbers 91-2
(June):3-4.
These short articles are based on Hiebert's, but explain the results of
using western science (for example geological surveys looking for water) in
cultures with magical worldviews. Often, Christian development teams
contribute to magical perceptions of reality by using modern science. Myers
recommends making well digging a part of a covenant between religious
people, so that when the work is successful, God can be glorified.
This article explained group vs. self orientation. The two authors
distinguished between group/individual orientation and self/ other orientation.
The key difference, according to the authors, is that although Latin Americans
are group-oriented, their point of reference is self, not other. They give an
example of a Mexican's rights being put in question. While a North American
is likely to go from the general to the specific (all men are created equal,
therefore I can do this), the Latin will likely begin with self (I am a man and
can do what I please); his own rights are primary, and it is others' rights
which are derived.
This is an important source, but of special notice is that in some
societies, patron-client relationships become the central aspect of institutional
and structural organization.
Lomnitz explains the concepts and practical manifestations of
friendship in Latin America She lists the types of services performed in the
compradrazgo system, rules of reciprocity and their relationship to the degrees
of social distance (called confianza).
One of the best parts of Leeds' article is Teixeira's figure of Brazilian
power structure. The society is divided between the classes and the masses,
with a very small cupula on top. The classes are largely comprised of interest
groups (i.e., railroad workers, bank workers, government employees, dock
workers) striving for influence on and favors from the cupula. All one has to
do is read the paper or listen to the news to hear these interest groups
mentioned repeatedly. The figure is somewhat dated, and I would add
multi-national corporations as an outside force acting on the cupula much as
the Catholic church does in his diagram. Among these interest groups,
networking is important -- within each (ingrejinhas) and group to
group (panelinhas).
Loewen, a former translation consultant with the United Bible
Society, discusses the difference between the expectations of the sending
church and those of the people to whom he or she goes. He notes that the
latter may significantly change the missionary's views: "If you come home
totally intact and can fit into the home community without any strain, you
probably learned very little worthwhile ... when we return to our home
community for good, we suddenly realize how poorly we fit into the home
church setting. There seemed to be almost no relationship between our
concerns and those of the home church that had originally sent us." (page
259).
For this author, culture shock is a sign of emotional engagement in
the culture and necessary for a true learning process of the new culture. His
thesis is that the learning of a culture is through resocialization and
transference (the interpreting of present relationships with the emotions of an
old or fanaticized relationships). More specifically, learning a culture is like
becoming a child again, and often prompts the emotions and crisis (and
dreams) we suffered as children (powerless, not understanding, etc.). But
then as the foreigner/child learns the societies way of life, he becomes an adult
(closer to an emic understanding of the culture).
This is a collection of interesting and often humorous reflections of
anthropologists about times they failed or embarrassed themselves. It makes
fieldwork much more real and less intimidating, and indicates that anthropologists seem to do no better than missionaries when it comes to making fools
of themselves.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Michael Landon
GENERAL
WORLDVIEW AND VALUES
Peasant Worldview
The Flaw of the Excluded Middle
GROUP VS. SELF-ORIENTATION
DEPENDENT RELATIONSHIPS
GOVERNMENT
REASONS FOR POVERTY
The Culture of Poverty Literature
The first is the "culture of poverty" initially developed by Oscar Lewis.
He has several published works on the topic, as have numerous government
officials and educators who have adopted this view. Some of the principal
criticisms have been registered in volumes by Eleanor Leacock and Charles
Valentine.
Ethos Literature
Similar to the culture of poverty explanation is one called the ethos
explanation. The difference is that while the culture of poverty deals with the
individual's worldview and material world, the ethos category deals with
structural expectations (i.e., expectation of fair play, educational system,
match of skills and job) of the society.
Personal Irresponsibility
This view is probably typical of many North American Christians.
Structural Sin
The term originates with Liberation Theologians. The most useful
seem to be Clodovis Boff and Manuel Alcala. Boff clarifies that "social sin
would be therefore, a human evil which acquires an existence exterior to the
conscience of individuals and forces itself on the conscience" (1977: 693).
CONVERSION OF THE MISSIONARY
Mirrored by permission of ACU Missions Personnel
Direct questions and comments to Ed Mathews,
![]()